Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Identity Theft
Corruption Fraud · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest identity theft reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 19 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact identity_theft-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 19 city-linked districts

Where the identity theft reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Ranks 11–19 Not ranked
Indian districts containing cities in the identity theft reporting ranking India's national silhouette has a soft boundary shadow. District lines are subdued, while the 19 districts containing ranked cities are highlighted by rank. #8 Bhopal — Bhopal district proxy — 6.02 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#11 Patna — Patna district proxy — 3.44 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#12 Gurugram — Gurgaon district proxy — 3.36 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#7 Dehradun — Dehradun district proxy — 6.15 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#18 Bengaluru — Bangalore district proxy — 1.03 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#17 Pune — Pune district proxy — 1.66 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#14 Mumbai — Mumbai Suburban district proxy — 2.34 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#13 Nagpur — Nagpur district proxy — 2.87 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#3 Moradabad — Moradabad district proxy — 13.67 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#10 Meerut — Meerut district proxy — 3.85 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#2 Aligarh — Aligarh district proxy — 14.73 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#5 Bareilly — Bareilly district proxy — 7.21 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#4 Mathura — Mathura district proxy — 7.42 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#6 Lucknow — Lucknow district proxy — 6.51 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#15 Varanasi — Varanasi district proxy — 2.15 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#1 Ghaziabad — Ghaziabad district proxy — 19.99 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#9 Noida — Gautam Buddha Nagar district proxy — 5.40 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#16 Prayagraj — Allahabad district proxy — 1.86 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#19 New Delhi — Central district proxy — 0.84 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Ghaziabad leads the normalized comparison at 19.99 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Ghaziabad leads raw volume with 34 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
19
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Ghaziabad
19.99 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
Ghaziabad
34 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Ghaziabad
+18.87 per-10K points
National comparison
+0.32
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Identity Theft reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Ghaziabad
Uttar Pradesh
19.99341+18.875/5
2Aligarh
Uttar Pradesh
14.73513+21.712/5
3Moradabad
Uttar Pradesh
13.67514-31.212/5
4Mathura
Uttar Pradesh
7.42415+12.792/5
5Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh
7.2169-4.244/5
6Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
6.51234+3.405/5
7Dehradun
Uttarakhand
6.15611+5.153/5
8Bhopal
Madhya Pradesh
6.02106-4.394/5
9Noida
Uttar Pradesh
5.40115+0.985/5
10Meerut
Uttar Pradesh
3.85416-3.103/5
11Patna
Bihar
3.4497+0.024/5
12Gurugram
Haryana
3.3688+1.194/5
13Nagpur
Maharashtra
2.87317+4.002/5
14Mumbai
Maharashtra
2.34282-1.215/5
15Varanasi
Uttar Pradesh
2.15319+2.572/5
16Prayagraj
Uttar Pradesh
1.86318+1.322/5
17Pune
Maharashtra
1.66612+0.494/5
18Bengaluru
Karnataka
1.03610-1.334/5
19New Delhi
Delhi
0.84253-0.535/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #1 · established coverage base

Ghaziabad: Identity Theft reporting profile

34 tagged reports appeared within 17,010 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 19.99 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 12.11 in 2021–2023 versus 30.98 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
19.99
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
34
5 active years
Recent change
+18.87
per-10K points
Action marker
41.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 12.03/10K (4 reports)2022 · 14.43/10K (5 reports)2023 · 9.62/10K (3 reports)2024 · 12.37/10K (5 reports)2025 · 55.59/10K (17 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 34

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 14 reports (41.2%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ghaziabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #13 · qualified coverage base

Aligarh: Identity Theft reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 3,394 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 14.73 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.24 in 2021–2023 versus 26.95 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
14.73
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
+21.71
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 15.43/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 50.38/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Aligarh's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #14 · qualified coverage base

Moradabad: Identity Theft reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 3,657 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 13.67 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 31.21 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
13.67
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-31.21
per-10K points
Action marker
40.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 16.92/10K (1 reports)2022 · 68.61/10K (4 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (40.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Moradabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #15 · qualified coverage base

Mathura: Identity Theft reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 5,388 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.42 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 2.88 in 2021–2023 versus 15.67 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
7.42
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
+12.79
per-10K points
Action marker
25.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 9.37/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 38.96/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (25.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mathura's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #9 · qualified coverage base

Bareilly: Identity Theft reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 8,318 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.21 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 9.25 in 2021–2023 versus 5.01 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
7.21
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
4 active years
Recent change
-4.24
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 13.56/10K (2 reports)2022 · 7.70/10K (1 reports)2023 · 6.45/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 10.83/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bareilly's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #4 · established coverage base

Lucknow: Identity Theft reporting profile

23 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.51 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.16 in 2021–2023 versus 8.56 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
6.51
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
23
5 active years
Recent change
+3.40
per-10K points
Action marker
17.4%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 9.00/10K (6 reports)2022 · 2.48/10K (2 reports)2023 · 4.55/10K (3 reports)2024 · 3.94/10K (3 reports)2025 · 14.08/10K (9 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 23

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (17.4%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Dehradun: Identity Theft reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 9,750 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.15 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 3.79 in 2021–2023 versus 8.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
6.15
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
3 active years
Recent change
+5.15
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 10.65/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 8.44/10K (2 reports)2025 · 9.50/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Dehradun's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #6 · qualified coverage base

Bhopal: Identity Theft reporting profile

10 tagged reports appeared within 16,621 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.02 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 7.64 in 2021–2023 versus 3.25 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
6.02
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
10
4 active years
Recent change
-4.39
per-10K points
Action marker
30.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 21.61/10K (6 reports)2022 · 2.78/10K (1 reports)2023 · 2.44/10K (1 reports)2024 · 7.72/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 10

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (30.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhopal's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #5 · qualified coverage base

Noida: Identity Theft reporting profile

11 tagged reports appeared within 20,361 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 5.40 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 5.00 in 2021–2023 versus 5.98 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
5.40
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
11
5 active years
Recent change
+0.98
per-10K points
Action marker
9.1%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 9.24/10K (3 reports)2022 · 4.31/10K (2 reports)2023 · 2.43/10K (1 reports)2024 · 3.93/10K (2 reports)2025 · 9.17/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 10Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (9.1%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Noida's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #16 · qualified coverage base

Meerut: Identity Theft reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 10,393 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.85 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.24 in 2021–2023 versus 2.14 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
3.85
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
3 active years
Recent change
-3.10
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.29/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 13.08/10K (2 reports)2024 · 3.88/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Meerut's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #7 · qualified coverage base

Patna: Identity Theft reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 26,153 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.44 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 3.43 in 2021–2023 versus 3.45 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
3.44
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
4 active years
Recent change
+0.02
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 7.44/10K (4 reports)2023 · 2.08/10K (1 reports)2024 · 1.75/10K (1 reports)2025 · 5.09/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 8Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Patna's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #12 · raw-volume #8 · qualified coverage base

Gurugram: Identity Theft reporting profile

8 tagged reports appeared within 23,841 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.36 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 2.86 in 2021–2023 versus 4.05 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
3.36
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
8
4 active years
Recent change
+1.19
per-10K points
Action marker
62.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 1.75/10K (1 reports)2023 · 5.45/10K (3 reports)2024 · 3.88/10K (2 reports)2025 · 4.24/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 8

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (62.5%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Gurugram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #13 · raw-volume #17 · qualified coverage base

Nagpur: Identity Theft reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 10,447 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.87 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.47 in 2021–2023 versus 5.47 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
2.87
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+4.00
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 3.88/10K (1 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 12.85/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nagpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #14 · raw-volume #2 · established coverage base

Mumbai: Identity Theft reporting profile

28 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.34 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 2.79 in 2021–2023 versus 1.58 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
2.34
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
28
5 active years
Recent change
-1.21
per-10K points
Action marker
17.9%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 2.59/10K (6 reports)2022 · 3.15/10K (9 reports)2023 · 2.56/10K (6 reports)2024 · 1.91/10K (4 reports)2025 · 1.28/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 15Crime & violence · 13

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (17.9%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #15 · raw-volume #19 · qualified coverage base

Varanasi: Identity Theft reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 13,958 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.15 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.16 in 2021–2023 versus 3.73 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.15
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+2.57
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.31/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 10.87/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 2Policing & law enforcement · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Varanasi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #16 · raw-volume #18 · qualified coverage base

Prayagraj: Identity Theft reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 16,169 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.86 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.21 in 2021–2023 versus 2.53 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
1.86
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+1.32
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.41/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 4.79/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Prayagraj's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #17 · raw-volume #12 · qualified coverage base

Pune: Identity Theft reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.66 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.45 in 2021–2023 versus 1.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
1.66
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
4 active years
Recent change
+0.49
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.65/10K (1 reports)2022 · 2.74/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 2.47/10K (2 reports)2025 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #18 · raw-volume #10 · qualified coverage base

Bengaluru: Identity Theft reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.03 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 1.68 in 2021–2023 versus 0.35 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
1.03
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
4 active years
Recent change
-1.33
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.59/10K (1 reports)2022 · 1.85/10K (2 reports)2023 · 1.59/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.66/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4Policing & law enforcement · 1Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #19 · raw-volume #3 · established coverage base

New Delhi: Identity Theft reporting profile

25 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 0.84 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.05 in 2021–2023 versus 0.52 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
0.84
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
25
5 active years
Recent change
-0.53
per-10K points
Action marker
48.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.10/10K (5 reports)2022 · 0.93/10K (6 reports)2023 · 1.13/10K (8 reports)2024 · 0.65/10K (4 reports)2025 · 0.36/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 21Crime & violence · 3Human Rights Social · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 12 reports (48.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 2.76/10K (43)2022 · 2.07/10K (45)2023 · 1.71/10K (37)2024 · 1.85/10K (38)2025 · 3.05/10K (59)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag identity_theft; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →