Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Consumer Dispute
Legal Judicial · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest consumer dispute reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 25 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact consumer_dispute-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 25 city-linked districts

Where the consumer dispute reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Ranks 11–20Ranks 21–25 Not ranked
Indian districts containing cities in the consumer dispute reporting ranking India's national silhouette has a soft boundary shadow. District lines are subdued, while the 25 districts containing ranked cities are highlighted by rank. #19 Indore — Indore district proxy — 3.53 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#1 Vadodara — Vadodara district proxy — 28.37 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#9 Surat — Surat district proxy — 7.16 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#11 Gurugram — Gurgaon district proxy — 6.71 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#2 Chandigarh — Chandigarh district proxy — 21.51 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#13 Raipur — Raipur district proxy — 4.49 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#15 Dehradun — Dehradun district proxy — 4.10 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#24 Thiruvananthapuram — Thiruvananthapuram district proxy — 2.03 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#25 Kolkata — Kolkata district proxy — 1.92 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#5 Ludhiana — Ludhiana district proxy — 14.78 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#7 Bengaluru — Bangalore district proxy — 8.42 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#22 Pune — Pune district proxy — 2.48 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#10 Thane — Thane district proxy — 6.72 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#23 Mumbai — Mumbai Suburban district proxy — 2.09 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#12 Nagpur — Nagpur district proxy — 4.79 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#4 Jodhpur — Jodhpur district proxy — 15.36 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#14 Jaipur — Jaipur district proxy — 4.32 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#3 Kota — Kota district proxy — 19.31 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#8 Mathura — Mathura district proxy — 7.42 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#17 Lucknow — Lucknow district proxy — 3.68 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#21 Ghaziabad — Ghaziabad district proxy — 2.94 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#20 Noida — Gautam Buddha Nagar district proxy — 2.95 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#6 Agra — Agra district proxy — 8.64 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#18 Chennai — Chennai district proxy — 3.60 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#16 New Delhi — Central district proxy — 3.70 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Vadodara leads the normalized comparison at 28.37 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. New Delhi leads raw volume with 110 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
25
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Vadodara
28.37 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
New Delhi
110 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Chandigarh
+9.36 per-10K points
National comparison
+0.76
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Consumer Dispute reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Vadodara
Gujarat
28.37811-19.205/5
2Chandigarh
Chandigarh
21.51483+9.365/5
3Kota
Rajasthan
19.31517+46.132/5
4Jodhpur
Rajasthan
15.36516-24.192/5
5Ludhiana
Punjab
14.78195-14.904/5
6Agra
Uttar Pradesh
8.6499+17.653/5
7Bengaluru
Karnataka
8.42492-6.885/5
8Mathura
Uttar Pradesh
7.42422-11.522/5
9Surat
Gujarat
7.16324+0.143/5
10Thane
Maharashtra
6.72519-10.352/5
11Gurugram
Haryana
6.71166+4.115/5
12Nagpur
Maharashtra
4.79518-3.152/5
13Raipur
Chhattisgarh
4.49423-7.302/5
14Jaipur
Rajasthan
4.32712+6.523/5
15Dehradun
Uttarakhand
4.10420-7.582/5
16New Delhi
Delhi
3.701101+1.405/5
17Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
3.68137+6.914/5
18Chennai
Tamil Nadu
3.60108+5.073/5
19Indore
Madhya Pradesh
3.53421-2.022/5
20Noida
Uttar Pradesh
2.95614+3.113/5
21Ghaziabad
Uttar Pradesh
2.94515+7.041/5
22Pune
Maharashtra
2.48910-0.954/5
23Mumbai
Maharashtra
2.09254+1.335/5
24Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
2.03325+2.822/5
25Kolkata
West Bengal
1.92613+2.603/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Vadodara: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

8 tagged reports appeared within 2,820 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 28.37 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 36.32 in 2021–2023 versus 17.12 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
28.37
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
8
5 active years
Recent change
-19.20
per-10K points
Action marker
62.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 36.43/10K (2 reports)2022 · 16.37/10K (1 reports)2023 · 60.98/10K (3 reports)2024 · 17.76/10K (1 reports)2025 · 16.53/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4Governance & policy · 3Public safety · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (62.5%) and conclusion language in 5 (62.5%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Vadodara's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #3 · established coverage base

Chandigarh: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

48 tagged reports appeared within 22,311 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 21.51 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 18.50 in 2021–2023 versus 27.86 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
21.51
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
48
5 active years
Recent change
+9.36
per-10K points
Action marker
83.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.63/10K (2 reports)2022 · 24.22/10K (14 reports)2023 · 23.84/10K (12 reports)2024 · 25.97/10K (10 reports)2025 · 30.04/10K (10 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 25Governance & policy · 23

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 40 reports (83.3%) and conclusion language in 40 (83.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chandigarh's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #17 · qualified coverage base

Kota: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 2,590 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 19.31 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.00 in 2021–2023 versus 46.13 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
19.31
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
+46.13
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 16.58/10K (1 reports)2025 · 83.16/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kota's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #16 · qualified coverage base

Jodhpur: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 3,256 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 15.36 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 24.19 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
15.36
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-24.19
per-10K points
Action marker
80.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 71.17/10K (4 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 15.72/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (80.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (80.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jodhpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #5 · qualified coverage base

Ludhiana: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

19 tagged reports appeared within 12,851 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 14.78 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 18.25 in 2021–2023 versus 3.35 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
14.78
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
19
4 active years
Recent change
-14.90
per-10K points
Action marker
89.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 12.22/10K (3 reports)2022 · 26.40/10K (11 reports)2023 · 12.34/10K (4 reports)2024 · 7.04/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 12Governance & policy · 7

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 17 reports (89.5%) and conclusion language in 17 (89.5%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ludhiana's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #9 · qualified coverage base

Agra: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 10,412 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 8.64 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.60 in 2021–2023 versus 19.25 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
8.64
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
3 active years
Recent change
+17.65
per-10K points
Action marker
77.8%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 4.48/10K (1 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 20.94/10K (5 reports)2025 · 16.97/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 9

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 7 reports (77.8%) and conclusion language in 7 (77.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Agra's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #2 · established coverage base

Bengaluru: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

49 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 8.42 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 11.79 in 2021–2023 versus 4.91 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
8.42
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
49
5 active years
Recent change
-6.88
per-10K points
Action marker
79.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 9.52/10K (6 reports)2022 · 5.56/10K (6 reports)2023 · 18.24/10K (23 reports)2024 · 4.50/10K (6 reports)2025 · 5.27/10K (8 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 37Governance & policy · 11Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 39 reports (79.6%) and conclusion language in 39 (79.6%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #22 · qualified coverage base

Mathura: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 5,388 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.42 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 11.52 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
7.42
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-11.52
per-10K points
Action marker
75.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 20.66/10K (3 reports)2023 · 9.37/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (75.0%) and conclusion language in 3 (75.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mathura's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #24 · qualified coverage base

Surat: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 4,191 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.16 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 7.11 in 2021–2023 versus 7.25 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
7.16
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
3 active years
Recent change
+0.14
per-10K points
Action marker
100.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 16.42/10K (1 reports)2022 · 11.96/10K (1 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 14.08/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (100.0%) and conclusion language in 3 (100.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Surat's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #19 · qualified coverage base

Thane: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 7,439 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.72 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 10.35 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
6.72
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-10.35
per-10K points
Action marker
80.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 12.00/10K (2 reports)2023 · 14.49/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 3Legal Judicial · 2

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (80.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (80.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Thane's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #6 · qualified coverage base

Gurugram: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

16 tagged reports appeared within 23,841 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.71 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.01 in 2021–2023 versus 9.12 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
6.71
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
16
5 active years
Recent change
+4.11
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.64/10K (1 reports)2022 · 5.24/10K (3 reports)2023 · 5.45/10K (3 reports)2024 · 13.57/10K (7 reports)2025 · 4.24/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 9Governance & policy · 7

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 8 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 5 (31.2%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Gurugram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #12 · raw-volume #18 · qualified coverage base

Nagpur: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 10,447 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.79 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.89 in 2021–2023 versus 2.74 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
4.79
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-3.15
per-10K points
Action marker
80.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 15.53/10K (4 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 6.42/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (80.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (80.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nagpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #13 · raw-volume #23 · qualified coverage base

Raipur: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 8,910 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.49 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 7.30 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
4.49
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-7.30
per-10K points
Action marker
100.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 11.77/10K (2 reports)2023 · 8.21/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 3Legal Judicial · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (100.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (100.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Raipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #14 · raw-volume #12 · qualified coverage base

Jaipur: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

7 tagged reports appeared within 16,200 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.32 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.94 in 2021–2023 versus 8.46 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
4.32
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
7
3 active years
Recent change
+6.52
per-10K points
Action marker
14.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 4.93/10K (2 reports)2024 · 3.85/10K (1 reports)2025 · 12.07/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 4Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (14.3%) and conclusion language in 1 (14.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jaipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #15 · raw-volume #20 · qualified coverage base

Dehradun: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 9,750 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.10 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 7.58 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
4.10
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-7.58
per-10K points
Action marker
100.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 12.75/10K (2 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 10.94/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (100.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (100.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Dehradun's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #16 · raw-volume #1 · high coverage base

New Delhi: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

110 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.70 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 3.15 in 2021–2023 versus 4.55 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
3.70
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
110
5 active years
Recent change
+1.40
per-10K points
Action marker
77.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 5.08/10K (23 reports)2022 · 2.78/10K (18 reports)2023 · 2.27/10K (16 reports)2024 · 5.20/10K (32 reports)2025 · 3.82/10K (21 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 85Governance & policy · 21Corruption Fraud · 2

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 85 reports (77.3%) and conclusion language in 83 (75.5%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #17 · raw-volume #7 · qualified coverage base

Lucknow: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

13 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.68 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.94 in 2021–2023 versus 7.85 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
3.68
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
13
4 active years
Recent change
+6.91
per-10K points
Action marker
69.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.50/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 1.52/10K (1 reports)2024 · 13.12/10K (10 reports)2025 · 1.56/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 9Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 9 reports (69.2%) and conclusion language in 9 (69.2%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #18 · raw-volume #8 · qualified coverage base

Chennai: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

10 tagged reports appeared within 27,784 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.60 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.31 in 2021–2023 versus 6.38 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
3.60
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
10
3 active years
Recent change
+5.07
per-10K points
Action marker
100.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 2.67/10K (2 reports)2024 · 5.00/10K (3 reports)2025 · 7.64/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 6Governance & policy · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (100.0%) and conclusion language in 10 (100.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chennai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #19 · raw-volume #21 · qualified coverage base

Indore: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 11,332 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.53 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 4.31 in 2021–2023 versus 2.29 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
3.53
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-2.02
per-10K points
Action marker
25.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 10.61/10K (3 reports)2024 · 5.49/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (25.0%) and conclusion language in 1 (25.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Indore's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #20 · raw-volume #14 · qualified coverage base

Noida: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 20,361 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.95 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.67 in 2021–2023 versus 4.78 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.95
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
3 active years
Recent change
+3.11
per-10K points
Action marker
66.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.08/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 2.43/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 12.23/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 4Legal Judicial · 2

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (66.7%) and conclusion language in 4 (66.7%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Noida's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #21 · raw-volume #15 · qualified coverage base

Ghaziabad: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 17,010 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.94 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.00 in 2021–2023 versus 7.04 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
2.94
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
1 active years
Recent change
+7.04
per-10K points
Action marker
60.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 12.37/10K (5 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Governance & policy · 3Corruption Fraud · 1Legal Judicial · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (60.0%) and conclusion language in 3 (60.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ghaziabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #22 · raw-volume #10 · qualified coverage base

Pune: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.48 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 2.89 in 2021–2023 versus 1.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
2.48
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
4 active years
Recent change
-0.95
per-10K points
Action marker
88.9%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.94/10K (3 reports)2022 · 2.74/10K (2 reports)2023 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)2024 · 3.70/10K (3 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 7Governance & policy · 2

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 8 reports (88.9%) and conclusion language in 8 (88.9%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #23 · raw-volume #4 · established coverage base

Mumbai: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

25 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.09 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.60 in 2021–2023 versus 2.93 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
2.09
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
25
5 active years
Recent change
+1.33
per-10K points
Action marker
80.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.43/10K (1 reports)2022 · 1.75/10K (5 reports)2023 · 2.56/10K (6 reports)2024 · 4.77/10K (10 reports)2025 · 1.28/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 13Governance & policy · 11Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 20 reports (80.0%) and conclusion language in 20 (80.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #24 · raw-volume #25 · qualified coverage base

Thiruvananthapuram: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 14,806 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.03 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.04 in 2021–2023 versus 3.86 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.03
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+2.82
per-10K points
Action marker
100.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 2.47/10K (1 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 7.83/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 2Governance & policy · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (100.0%) and conclusion language in 3 (100.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Thiruvananthapuram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #25 · raw-volume #13 · qualified coverage base

Kolkata: Consumer Dispute reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 31,282 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.92 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.63 in 2021–2023 versus 3.23 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
1.92
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
3 active years
Recent change
+2.60
per-10K points
Action marker
83.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 2.53/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.97/10K (1 reports)2025 · 7.75/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5Governance & policy · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (83.3%) and conclusion language in 5 (83.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kolkata's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 3.34/10K (52)2022 · 3.44/10K (75)2023 · 4.16/10K (90)2024 · 4.88/10K (100)2025 · 3.98/10K (77)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag consumer_dispute; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →