Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Cheating Fraud
Crime & violence · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest cheating fraud reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 32 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact cheating_fraud-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 32 city-linked districts

Where the cheating fraud reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Ranks 11–20Ranks 21–32 Not ranked
Indian districts containing cities in the cheating fraud reporting ranking India's national silhouette has a soft boundary shadow. District lines are subdued, while the 32 districts containing ranked cities are highlighted by rank. #22 Indore — Indore district proxy — 7.94 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#30 Bhopal — Bhopal district proxy — 3.01 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#6 Vadodara — Vadodara district proxy — 31.91 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#3 Surat — Surat district proxy — 45.34 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#11 Gurugram — Gurgaon district proxy — 16.36 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#12 Chandigarh — Chandigarh district proxy — 15.69 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#29 Raipur — Raipur district proxy — 3.37 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#25 Dehradun — Dehradun district proxy — 6.15 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#8 Kochi — Ernakulam district proxy — 25.34 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#17 Thiruvananthapuram — Thiruvananthapuram district proxy — 10.81 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#28 Kolkata — Kolkata district proxy — 3.52 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#16 Ludhiana — Ludhiana district proxy — 10.89 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#18 Mysuru — Mysore district proxy — 10.70 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#15 Bengaluru — Bangalore district proxy — 11.86 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#2 Nashik — Nashik district proxy — 51.59 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#4 Pune — Pune district proxy — 40.84 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#1 Thane — Thane district proxy — 67.21 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#7 Mumbai — Mumbai Suburban district proxy — 30.29 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#14 Nagpur — Nagpur district proxy — 14.36 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#21 Bhubaneswar — Khordha district proxy — 8.05 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#24 Jaipur — Jaipur district proxy — 6.79 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#10 Udaipur — Udaipur district proxy — 17.08 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#20 Meerut — Meerut district proxy — 10.58 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#26 Lucknow — Lucknow district proxy — 4.53 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#27 Varanasi — Varanasi district proxy — 3.58 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#19 Ghaziabad — Ghaziabad district proxy — 10.58 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#13 Noida — Gautam Buddha Nagar district proxy — 15.23 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#31 Agra — Agra district proxy — 2.88 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#9 Chennai — Chennai district proxy — 17.64 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#32 Prayagraj — Allahabad district proxy — 2.47 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#5 Coimbatore — Coimbatore district proxy — 39.18 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#23 New Delhi — Central district proxy — 7.37 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Thane leads the normalized comparison at 67.21 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Mumbai leads raw volume with 362 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
32
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Thane
67.21 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
Mumbai
362 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Thane
+26.44 per-10K points
National comparison
-5.12
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Cheating Fraud reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Thane
Maharashtra
67.21505+26.445/5
2Nashik
Maharashtra
51.591813+19.405/5
3Surat
Gujarat
45.341911-13.575/5
4Pune
Maharashtra
40.841483-42.015/5
5Coimbatore
Tamil Nadu
39.181714-53.314/5
6Vadodara
Gujarat
31.91924-54.483/5
7Mumbai
Maharashtra
30.293621+2.425/5
8Kochi
Kerala
25.342310-21.355/5
9Chennai
Tamil Nadu
17.64496+4.185/5
10Udaipur
Rajasthan
17.08725+46.592/5
11Gurugram
Haryana
16.36397-7.175/5
12Chandigarh
Chandigarh
15.69358-14.925/5
13Noida
Uttar Pradesh
15.23319-11.635/5
14Nagpur
Maharashtra
14.361517-17.874/5
15Bengaluru
Karnataka
11.86694-9.485/5
16Ludhiana
Punjab
10.891419+11.965/5
17Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
10.811616-16.613/5
18Mysuru
Karnataka
10.70528-22.872/5
19Ghaziabad
Uttar Pradesh
10.581812+3.594/5
20Meerut
Uttar Pradesh
10.581122-11.444/5
21Bhubaneswar
Odisha
8.051418-0.484/5
22Indore
Madhya Pradesh
7.94923-9.194/5
23New Delhi
Delhi
7.372192-3.225/5
24Jaipur
Rajasthan
6.791120-0.034/5
25Dehradun
Uttarakhand
6.15626+9.273/5
26Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
4.531615-2.785/5
27Varanasi
Uttar Pradesh
3.58529-5.823/5
28Kolkata
West Bengal
3.521121-3.124/5
29Raipur
Chhattisgarh
3.37332-0.732/5
30Bhopal
Madhya Pradesh
3.01527-2.194/5
31Agra
Uttar Pradesh
2.88331+3.212/5
32Prayagraj
Uttar Pradesh
2.47430-2.364/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #5 · established coverage base

Thane: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

50 tagged reports appeared within 7,439 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 67.21 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 57.95 in 2021–2023 versus 84.39 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
67.21
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
50
5 active years
Recent change
+26.44
per-10K points
Action marker
20.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 45.70/10K (5 reports)2022 · 35.99/10K (6 reports)2023 · 82.09/10K (17 reports)2024 · 124.83/10K (18 reports)2025 · 34.33/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 37Corruption Fraud · 13

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (20.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Thane's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #13 · qualified coverage base

Nashik: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

18 tagged reports appeared within 3,489 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 51.59 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 46.53 in 2021–2023 versus 65.93 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
51.59
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
18
5 active years
Recent change
+19.40
per-10K points
Action marker
55.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 53.19/10K (3 reports)2022 · 67.50/10K (7 reports)2023 · 20.45/10K (2 reports)2024 · 27.32/10K (1 reports)2025 · 91.91/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 11Corruption Fraud · 4Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (55.6%) and conclusion language in 5 (27.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nashik's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Surat: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

19 tagged reports appeared within 4,191 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 45.34 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 49.80 in 2021–2023 versus 36.23 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
45.34
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
19
5 active years
Recent change
-13.57
per-10K points
Action marker
26.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 16.42/10K (1 reports)2022 · 11.96/10K (1 reports)2023 · 87.85/10K (12 reports)2024 · 14.93/10K (1 reports)2025 · 56.34/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 13Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (26.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Surat's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #3 · high coverage base

Pune: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

148 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 40.84 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 58.80 in 2021–2023 versus 16.79 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
40.84
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
148
5 active years
Recent change
-42.01
per-10K points
Action marker
43.9%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 111.93/10K (68 reports)2022 · 45.23/10K (33 reports)2023 · 28.46/10K (21 reports)2024 · 13.56/10K (11 reports)2025 · 20.33/10K (15 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 122Corruption Fraud · 21Policing & law enforcement · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 65 reports (43.9%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #14 · qualified coverage base

Coimbatore: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

17 tagged reports appeared within 4,339 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 39.18 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 59.39 in 2021–2023 versus 6.08 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
39.18
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
17
4 active years
Recent change
-53.31
per-10K points
Action marker
88.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 16.37/10K (1 reports)2022 · 33.28/10K (4 reports)2023 · 124.86/10K (11 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 8.99/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 14Policing & law enforcement · 2Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 15 reports (88.2%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Coimbatore's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #24 · qualified coverage base

Vadodara: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 2,820 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 31.91 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 54.48 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
31.91
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
3 active years
Recent change
-54.48
per-10K points
Action marker
55.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 54.64/10K (3 reports)2022 · 16.37/10K (1 reports)2023 · 101.63/10K (5 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 8Policing & law enforcement · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (55.6%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Vadodara's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #1 · high coverage base

Mumbai: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

362 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 30.29 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 29.39 in 2021–2023 versus 31.81 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
30.29
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
362
5 active years
Recent change
+2.42
per-10K points
Action marker
40.1%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 16.81/10K (39 reports)2022 · 29.40/10K (84 reports)2023 · 41.85/10K (98 reports)2024 · 28.12/10K (59 reports)2025 · 35.12/10K (82 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 227Corruption Fraud · 127Legal Judicial · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 145 reports (40.1%) and conclusion language in 7 (1.9%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #10 · established coverage base

Kochi: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

23 tagged reports appeared within 9,077 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 25.34 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 31.98 in 2021–2023 versus 10.63 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
25.34
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
23
5 active years
Recent change
-21.35
per-10K points
Action marker
21.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 60.45/10K (7 reports)2022 · 3.63/10K (1 reports)2023 · 51.24/10K (12 reports)2024 · 8.33/10K (1 reports)2025 · 12.33/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 15Crime & violence · 7Legal Judicial · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (21.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kochi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #6 · established coverage base

Chennai: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

49 tagged reports appeared within 27,784 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 17.64 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 15.75 in 2021–2023 versus 19.93 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
17.64
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
49
5 active years
Recent change
+4.18
per-10K points
Action marker
73.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 26.85/10K (8 reports)2022 · 10.51/10K (5 reports)2023 · 14.66/10K (11 reports)2024 · 13.33/10K (8 reports)2025 · 25.98/10K (17 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 40Corruption Fraud · 9

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 36 reports (73.5%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chennai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #25 · qualified coverage base

Udaipur: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

7 tagged reports appeared within 4,098 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 17.08 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 3.45 in 2021–2023 versus 50.04 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
17.08
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
7
2 active years
Recent change
+46.59
per-10K points
Action marker
28.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 26.04/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 95.09/10K (6 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (28.6%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Udaipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #7 · established coverage base

Gurugram: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

39 tagged reports appeared within 23,841 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 16.36 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 19.33 in 2021–2023 versus 12.16 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
16.36
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
39
5 active years
Recent change
-7.17
per-10K points
Action marker
46.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 10.92/10K (3 reports)2022 · 20.97/10K (12 reports)2023 · 21.82/10K (12 reports)2024 · 13.57/10K (7 reports)2025 · 10.60/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 28Corruption Fraud · 8Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 18 reports (46.2%) and conclusion language in 2 (5.1%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Gurugram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #12 · raw-volume #8 · established coverage base

Chandigarh: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

35 tagged reports appeared within 22,311 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 15.69 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 20.49 in 2021–2023 versus 5.57 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
15.69
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
35
5 active years
Recent change
-14.92
per-10K points
Action marker
48.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 9.26/10K (4 reports)2022 · 36.33/10K (21 reports)2023 · 11.92/10K (6 reports)2024 · 5.19/10K (2 reports)2025 · 6.01/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 16Crime & violence · 13Policing & law enforcement · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 17 reports (48.6%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chandigarh's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #13 · raw-volume #9 · established coverage base

Noida: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

31 tagged reports appeared within 20,361 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 15.23 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 20.00 in 2021–2023 versus 8.37 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
15.23
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
31
5 active years
Recent change
-11.63
per-10K points
Action marker
71.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 21.56/10K (7 reports)2022 · 10.78/10K (5 reports)2023 · 29.18/10K (12 reports)2024 · 1.96/10K (1 reports)2025 · 18.35/10K (6 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 24Corruption Fraud · 7

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 22 reports (71.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Noida's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #14 · raw-volume #17 · qualified coverage base

Nagpur: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

15 tagged reports appeared within 10,447 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 14.36 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 20.61 in 2021–2023 versus 2.74 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
14.36
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
15
4 active years
Recent change
-17.87
per-10K points
Action marker
26.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.19/10K (1 reports)2022 · 15.53/10K (4 reports)2023 · 34.59/10K (9 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 4.77/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 11Crime & violence · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (26.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nagpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #15 · raw-volume #4 · established coverage base

Bengaluru: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

69 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 11.86 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 16.50 in 2021–2023 versus 7.02 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
11.86
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
69
5 active years
Recent change
-9.48
per-10K points
Action marker
47.8%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 22.22/10K (14 reports)2022 · 18.55/10K (20 reports)2023 · 11.90/10K (15 reports)2024 · 6.00/10K (8 reports)2025 · 7.91/10K (12 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 49Corruption Fraud · 17Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 33 reports (47.8%) and conclusion language in 3 (4.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #16 · raw-volume #19 · qualified coverage base

Ludhiana: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

14 tagged reports appeared within 12,851 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 10.89 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 8.11 in 2021–2023 versus 20.07 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
10.89
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
14
5 active years
Recent change
+11.96
per-10K points
Action marker
14.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.07/10K (1 reports)2022 · 9.60/10K (4 reports)2023 · 9.26/10K (3 reports)2024 · 7.04/10K (1 reports)2025 · 31.87/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 9Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (14.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ludhiana's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #17 · raw-volume #16 · qualified coverage base

Thiruvananthapuram: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

16 tagged reports appeared within 14,806 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 10.81 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 16.61 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
10.81
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
16
3 active years
Recent change
-16.61
per-10K points
Action marker
6.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 12.51/10K (3 reports)2022 · 4.94/10K (2 reports)2023 · 34.58/10K (11 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 7Crime & violence · 5Policing & law enforcement · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (6.2%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Thiruvananthapuram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #18 · raw-volume #28 · qualified coverage base

Mysuru: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 4,674 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 10.70 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 22.87 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
10.70
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-22.87
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 12.80/10K (1 reports)2023 · 47.68/10K (4 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mysuru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #19 · raw-volume #12 · qualified coverage base

Ghaziabad: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

18 tagged reports appeared within 17,010 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 10.58 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 9.08 in 2021–2023 versus 12.67 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
10.58
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
18
4 active years
Recent change
+3.59
per-10K points
Action marker
72.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 14.43/10K (5 reports)2023 · 12.82/10K (4 reports)2024 · 17.31/10K (7 reports)2025 · 6.54/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 14Legal Judicial · 3Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 13 reports (72.2%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ghaziabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #20 · raw-volume #22 · qualified coverage base

Meerut: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

11 tagged reports appeared within 10,393 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 10.58 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 15.72 in 2021–2023 versus 4.28 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
10.58
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
11
4 active years
Recent change
-11.44
per-10K points
Action marker
63.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 17.15/10K (4 reports)2022 · 5.37/10K (1 reports)2023 · 26.16/10K (4 reports)2024 · 7.76/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 10Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 7 reports (63.6%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Meerut's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #21 · raw-volume #18 · qualified coverage base

Bhubaneswar: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

14 tagged reports appeared within 17,398 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 8.05 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 8.26 in 2021–2023 versus 7.78 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
8.05
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
14
4 active years
Recent change
-0.48
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 5.82/10K (2 reports)2023 · 17.32/10K (6 reports)2024 · 10.79/10K (4 reports)2025 · 4.99/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 10Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 7 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhubaneswar's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #22 · raw-volume #23 · qualified coverage base

Indore: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 11,332 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.94 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 11.48 in 2021–2023 versus 2.29 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
7.94
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
4 active years
Recent change
-9.19
per-10K points
Action marker
55.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.33/10K (1 reports)2022 · 11.71/10K (3 reports)2023 · 14.15/10K (4 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 3.93/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 8Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (55.6%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Indore's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #23 · raw-volume #2 · high coverage base

New Delhi: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

219 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.37 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 8.63 in 2021–2023 versus 5.41 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
7.37
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
219
5 active years
Recent change
-3.22
per-10K points
Action marker
63.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 8.61/10K (39 reports)2022 · 7.71/10K (50 reports)2023 · 9.49/10K (67 reports)2024 · 6.50/10K (40 reports)2025 · 4.19/10K (23 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 155Corruption Fraud · 37Legal Judicial · 25

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 138 reports (63.0%) and conclusion language in 7 (3.2%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #24 · raw-volume #20 · qualified coverage base

Jaipur: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

11 tagged reports appeared within 16,200 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.79 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 6.80 in 2021–2023 versus 6.77 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
6.79
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
11
4 active years
Recent change
-0.03
per-10K points
Action marker
45.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.68/10K (1 reports)2022 · 8.53/10K (3 reports)2023 · 7.39/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 12.07/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 7Policing & law enforcement · 3Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (45.5%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jaipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #25 · raw-volume #26 · qualified coverage base

Dehradun: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 9,750 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.15 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.90 in 2021–2023 versus 11.17 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
6.15
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
3 active years
Recent change
+9.27
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 5.47/10K (1 reports)2024 · 8.44/10K (2 reports)2025 · 14.25/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3Crime & violence · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Dehradun's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #26 · raw-volume #15 · qualified coverage base

Lucknow: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

16 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.53 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.63 in 2021–2023 versus 2.85 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
4.53
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
16
5 active years
Recent change
-2.78
per-10K points
Action marker
31.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.00/10K (4 reports)2022 · 7.44/10K (6 reports)2023 · 3.03/10K (2 reports)2024 · 2.62/10K (2 reports)2025 · 3.13/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 10Corruption Fraud · 5Policing & law enforcement · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (31.2%) and conclusion language in 1 (6.2%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #27 · raw-volume #29 · qualified coverage base

Varanasi: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 13,958 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.58 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.82 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
3.58
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
3 active years
Recent change
-5.82
per-10K points
Action marker
60.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 12.94/10K (3 reports)2022 · 2.72/10K (1 reports)2023 · 3.85/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 4Policing & law enforcement · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (60.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Varanasi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #28 · raw-volume #21 · qualified coverage base

Kolkata: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

11 tagged reports appeared within 31,282 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.52 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.06 in 2021–2023 versus 1.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
3.52
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
11
4 active years
Recent change
-3.12
per-10K points
Action marker
27.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 2.53/10K (1 reports)2022 · 1.55/10K (1 reports)2023 · 11.11/10K (6 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 5.81/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 9Corruption Fraud · 2

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (27.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kolkata's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #29 · raw-volume #32 · qualified coverage base

Raipur: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 8,910 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.37 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 3.65 in 2021–2023 versus 2.92 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
3.37
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
-0.73
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 11.77/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 6.49/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Raipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #30 · raw-volume #27 · qualified coverage base

Bhopal: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 16,621 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.01 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 3.82 in 2021–2023 versus 1.63 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
3.01
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
4 active years
Recent change
-2.19
per-10K points
Action marker
60.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.60/10K (1 reports)2022 · 5.57/10K (2 reports)2023 · 2.44/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 2.81/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 4Corruption Fraud · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (60.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhopal's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #31 · raw-volume #31 · qualified coverage base

Agra: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 10,412 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.88 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.60 in 2021–2023 versus 4.81 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.88
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+3.21
per-10K points
Action marker
66.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.41/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 11.31/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (66.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Agra's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #32 · raw-volume #30 · qualified coverage base

Prayagraj: Cheating Fraud reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 16,169 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.47 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 3.63 in 2021–2023 versus 1.27 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
2.47
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
4 active years
Recent change
-2.36
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.41/10K (1 reports)2022 · 4.24/10K (1 reports)2023 · 2.29/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 2.69/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Crime & violence · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Prayagraj's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 14.63/10K (228)2022 · 13.27/10K (289)2023 · 16.86/10K (365)2024 · 8.69/10K (178)2025 · 11.01/10K (213)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag cheating_fraud; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →