Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Tender Scam
Corruption Fraud · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest tender scam reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 13 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact tender_scam-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 13 city-linked districts

Where the tender scam reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Ranks 11–13 Not ranked

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Ludhiana leads the normalized comparison at 42.80 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Ludhiana leads raw volume with 55 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
13
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Ludhiana
42.80 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
Ludhiana
55 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Mumbai
-0.23 per-10K points
National comparison
-1.24
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Tender Scam reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Ludhiana
Punjab
42.80551-51.413/5
2Ghaziabad
Uttar Pradesh
5.2994+3.004/5
3Nagpur
Maharashtra
2.87313+4.002/5
4Mumbai
Maharashtra
2.18263-0.234/5
5Jaipur
Rajasthan
1.85311-2.922/5
6Chennai
Tamil Nadu
1.8057+1.083/5
7Bhubaneswar
Odisha
1.7239-3.102/5
8Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
1.7065+0.732/5
9New Delhi
Delhi
1.45432-0.835/5
10Pune
Maharashtra
1.3858+3.232/5
11Chandigarh
Chandigarh
1.34310-1.982/5
12Kolkata
West Bengal
0.96312-0.622/5
13Bengaluru
Karnataka
0.8656-1.004/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #1 · established coverage base

Ludhiana: Tender Scam reporting profile

55 tagged reports appeared within 12,851 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 42.80 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 54.76 in 2021–2023 versus 3.35 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
42.80
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
55
3 active years
Recent change
-51.41
per-10K points
Action marker
18.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 107.99/10K (45 reports)2023 · 27.77/10K (9 reports)2024 · 7.04/10K (1 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 54Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (18.2%) and conclusion language in 1 (1.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ludhiana's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #4 · qualified coverage base

Ghaziabad: Tender Scam reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 17,010 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 5.29 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 4.04 in 2021–2023 versus 7.04 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
5.29
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
4 active years
Recent change
+3.00
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.01/10K (1 reports)2022 · 8.66/10K (3 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 7.42/10K (3 reports)2025 · 6.54/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 9

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Ghaziabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #13 · qualified coverage base

Nagpur: Tender Scam reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 10,447 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.87 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.47 in 2021–2023 versus 5.47 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
2.87
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+4.00
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 3.84/10K (1 reports)2024 · 12.85/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nagpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #3 · established coverage base

Mumbai: Tender Scam reporting profile

26 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.18 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 2.26 in 2021–2023 versus 2.03 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
2.18
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
26
4 active years
Recent change
-0.23
per-10K points
Action marker
7.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 1.05/10K (3 reports)2023 · 5.98/10K (14 reports)2024 · 1.43/10K (3 reports)2025 · 2.57/10K (6 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 25Governance & policy · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (7.7%) and conclusion language in 1 (3.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Jaipur: Tender Scam reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 16,200 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.85 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 2.92 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
1.85
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
-2.92
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 2.84/10K (1 reports)2023 · 4.93/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jaipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #7 · qualified coverage base

Chennai: Tender Scam reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 27,784 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.80 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.31 in 2021–2023 versus 2.39 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
1.80
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
3 active years
Recent change
+1.08
per-10K points
Action marker
20.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 2.10/10K (1 reports)2023 · 1.33/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 4.59/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (20.0%) and conclusion language in 1 (20.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chennai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #9 · qualified coverage base

Bhubaneswar: Tender Scam reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 17,398 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.72 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 3.10 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
1.72
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
-3.10
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.60/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 5.77/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhubaneswar's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #5 · qualified coverage base

Lucknow: Tender Scam reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.70 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.41 in 2021–2023 versus 2.14 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
1.70
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
2 active years
Recent change
+0.73
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.50/10K (3 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 3.94/10K (3 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #2 · established coverage base

New Delhi: Tender Scam reporting profile

43 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.45 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.77 in 2021–2023 versus 0.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
1.45
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
43
5 active years
Recent change
-0.83
per-10K points
Action marker
11.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.22/10K (1 reports)2022 · 2.31/10K (15 reports)2023 · 2.27/10K (16 reports)2024 · 1.14/10K (7 reports)2025 · 0.73/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 43

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (11.6%) and conclusion language in 1 (2.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #8 · qualified coverage base

Pune: Tender Scam reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.38 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.00 in 2021–2023 versus 3.23 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
1.38
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
+3.23
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 4.93/10K (4 reports)2025 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #10 · qualified coverage base

Chandigarh: Tender Scam reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 22,311 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.34 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 1.98 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
1.34
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
-1.98
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 1.73/10K (1 reports)2023 · 3.97/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chandigarh's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #12 · raw-volume #12 · qualified coverage base

Kolkata: Tender Scam reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 31,282 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 0.96 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.27 in 2021–2023 versus 0.65 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
0.96
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
-0.62
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 3.11/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 1.94/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kolkata's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #13 · raw-volume #6 · qualified coverage base

Bengaluru: Tender Scam reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 0.86 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 1.35 in 2021–2023 versus 0.35 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
0.86
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
4 active years
Recent change
-1.00
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.59/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.93/10K (1 reports)2023 · 1.59/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.66/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 0.64/10K (10)2022 · 3.54/10K (77)2023 · 2.45/10K (53)2024 · 1.17/10K (24)2025 · 1.09/10K (21)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag tender_scam; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →