Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Ponzi Scheme
Corruption Fraud · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest ponzi scheme reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 11 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact ponzi_scheme-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 11 city-linked districts

Where the ponzi scheme reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Rank 11 Not ranked

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Surat leads the normalized comparison at 9.54 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Mumbai leads raw volume with 43 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
11
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Surat
9.54 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
Mumbai
43 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Mumbai
+7.55 per-10K points
National comparison
+0.65
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Ponzi Scheme reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Surat
Gujarat
9.54410-3.422/5
2Coimbatore
Tamil Nadu
9.2248-5.063/5
3Kolkata
West Bengal
6.71213-8.185/5
4Bhubaneswar
Odisha
5.1795-2.314/5
5Mumbai
Maharashtra
3.60431+7.554/5
6Chennai
Tamil Nadu
1.8057-0.382/5
7Bengaluru
Karnataka
1.72104-0.624/5
8Pune
Maharashtra
1.6666-0.644/5
9Noida
Uttar Pradesh
1.47311+1.562/5
10New Delhi
Delhi
1.21362+0.415/5
11Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
1.1349+1.673/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #10 · qualified coverage base

Surat: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 4,191 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 9.54 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 10.67 in 2021–2023 versus 7.25 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
9.54
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-3.42
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 35.89/10K (3 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 14.08/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Surat's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #8 · qualified coverage base

Coimbatore: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 4,339 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 9.22 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 11.14 in 2021–2023 versus 6.08 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
9.22
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
3 active years
Recent change
-5.06
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 8.32/10K (1 reports)2023 · 22.70/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 8.99/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 2 (50.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Coimbatore's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #3 · established coverage base

Kolkata: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

21 tagged reports appeared within 31,282 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.71 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 10.76 in 2021–2023 versus 2.58 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
6.71
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
21
5 active years
Recent change
-8.18
per-10K points
Action marker
47.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 20.22/10K (8 reports)2022 · 6.21/10K (4 reports)2023 · 9.26/10K (5 reports)2024 · 0.97/10K (1 reports)2025 · 5.81/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 21

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (47.6%) and conclusion language in 2 (9.5%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kolkata's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #5 · qualified coverage base

Bhubaneswar: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

9 tagged reports appeared within 17,398 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 5.17 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 6.20 in 2021–2023 versus 3.89 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
5.17
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
9
4 active years
Recent change
-2.31
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 11.64/10K (4 reports)2023 · 5.77/10K (2 reports)2024 · 2.70/10K (1 reports)2025 · 4.99/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 9

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 1 (11.1%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhubaneswar's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #1 · established coverage base

Mumbai: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

43 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.60 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.80 in 2021–2023 versus 8.35 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
3.60
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
43
4 active years
Recent change
+7.55
per-10K points
Action marker
14.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.86/10K (2 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 1.71/10K (4 reports)2024 · 4.29/10K (9 reports)2025 · 11.99/10K (28 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 43

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 6 reports (14.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #7 · qualified coverage base

Chennai: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 27,784 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.80 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.97 in 2021–2023 versus 1.59 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
1.80
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
2 active years
Recent change
-0.38
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 4.00/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 3.06/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chennai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #4 · qualified coverage base

Bengaluru: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

10 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.72 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 2.02 in 2021–2023 versus 1.40 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
1.72
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
10
4 active years
Recent change
-0.62
per-10K points
Action marker
50.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.17/10K (2 reports)2022 · 0.93/10K (1 reports)2023 · 2.38/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 2.64/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 10

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (50.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #6 · qualified coverage base

Pune: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

6 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.66 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.93 in 2021–2023 versus 1.29 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
1.66
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
6
4 active years
Recent change
-0.64
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 4.11/10K (3 reports)2023 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)2024 · 1.23/10K (1 reports)2025 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 6

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Noida: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 20,361 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.47 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.83 in 2021–2023 versus 2.39 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
1.47
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
2 active years
Recent change
+1.56
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 2.43/10K (1 reports)2024 · 3.93/10K (2 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Noida's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #2 · established coverage base

New Delhi: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

36 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.21 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 1.05 in 2021–2023 versus 1.46 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
1.21
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
36
5 active years
Recent change
+0.41
per-10K points
Action marker
27.8%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.55/10K (7 reports)2022 · 1.54/10K (10 reports)2023 · 0.28/10K (2 reports)2024 · 0.49/10K (3 reports)2025 · 2.55/10K (14 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 35Crime & violence · 1

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (27.8%) and conclusion language in 1 (2.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #9 · qualified coverage base

Lucknow: Ponzi Scheme reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.13 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.47 in 2021–2023 versus 2.14 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
1.13
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
3 active years
Recent change
+1.67
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.50/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 2.62/10K (2 reports)2025 · 1.56/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Corruption Fraud · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 1.48/10K (23)2022 · 1.29/10K (28)2023 · 1.34/10K (29)2024 · 0.93/10K (19)2025 · 3.15/10K (61)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag ponzi_scheme; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →