Prism Geo · city intelligence · pilot
Prism Geo · Rankings · Appeal Hearing
Legal Judicial · evidence ranking · 2021–2025

Which Indian cities show the strongest appeal hearing reporting signal?

A comparison of 45 Indian cities covered by Prism Geo. 22 pass the evidence gates and are ranked by exact appeal_hearing-tagged news reports per 10,000 civic reports. This measures the prominence of a topic in coverage—not real-world incidence, prevalence, or safety.

Geographic view · 22 city-linked districts

Where the appeal hearing reporting signal is concentrated

Every highlighted polygon is the 2021 administrative district containing a ranked city's coordinate. Color shows the city's reporting-signal rank band—not a measured district-wide rate, prevalence, or severity assessment.

Ranks 1–5Ranks 6–10Ranks 11–20Ranks 21–22 Not ranked
Indian districts containing cities in the appeal hearing reporting ranking India's national silhouette has a soft boundary shadow. District lines are subdued, while the 22 districts containing ranked cities are highlighted by rank. #17 Indore — Indore district proxy — 4.41 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#20 Bhopal — Bhopal district proxy — 2.41 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#3 Surat — Surat district proxy — 19.09 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#12 Patna — Patna district proxy — 7.26 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#6 Kochi — Ernakulam district proxy — 15.42 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#16 Thiruvananthapuram — Thiruvananthapuram district proxy — 5.40 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#8 Kolkata — Kolkata district proxy — 12.47 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#21 Bengaluru — Bangalore district proxy — 2.06 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#7 Nashik — Nashik district proxy — 14.33 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#22 Pune — Pune district proxy — 1.10 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#15 Mumbai — Mumbai Suburban district proxy — 5.86 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#5 Nagpur — Nagpur district proxy — 17.23 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#1 Jodhpur — Jodhpur district proxy — 73.71 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#11 Jaipur — Jaipur district proxy — 7.41 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#10 Moradabad — Moradabad district proxy — 8.20 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#4 Lucknow — Lucknow district proxy — 18.68 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#13 Varanasi — Varanasi district proxy — 7.16 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#14 Noida — Gautam Buddha Nagar district proxy — 6.38 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#19 Agra — Agra district proxy — 3.84 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#18 Chennai — Chennai district proxy — 4.32 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#2 Prayagraj — Allahabad district proxy — 22.88 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports#9 New Delhi — Central district proxy — 11.07 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports

Boundary geometry: geoBoundaries, ADM2, 2021 representation, Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0. Districts are visual locators for city-ranked data and may not reflect later administrative changes.

How to read this ranking

Jodhpur leads the normalized comparison at 73.71 tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. New Delhi leads raw volume with 329 reports. The two leaders can differ because normalization controls for each city's overall civic-news footprint.

Cities evaluated
45
existing India profiles
Cities ranked
22
passed both evidence gates
Normalized leader
Jodhpur
73.71 per 10K
Raw-volume leader
New Delhi
329 tagged reports
Largest recent rise
Kochi
+39.31 per-10K points
National comparison
+0.60
recent per-10K change
Computed findings
What stands out
Complete ranking
Primary and companion measures

Appeal Hearing reporting signal by city

The primary rank uses tagged reports per 10,000 civic reports. Raw rank, recent change, and active years show whether a result depends on city size, timing, or a narrow burst.

RankCitySignal / 10KTagged reportsRaw rankRecent changeActive years
1Jodhpur
Rajasthan
73.71246-76.374/5
2Prayagraj
Uttar Pradesh
22.88375+2.325/5
3Surat
Gujarat
19.09815-28.461/5
4Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh
18.68663-25.034/5
5Nagpur
Maharashtra
17.23188-9.665/5
6Kochi
Kerala
15.42149+39.313/5
7Nashik
Maharashtra
14.33518+54.951/5
8Kolkata
West Bengal
12.47394+14.965/5
9New Delhi
Delhi
11.073291+0.015/5
10Moradabad
Uttar Pradesh
8.20322+14.601/5
11Jaipur
Rajasthan
7.411213-1.003/5
12Patna
Bihar
7.26197+4.005/5
13Varanasi
Uttar Pradesh
7.161014+0.473/5
14Noida
Uttar Pradesh
6.381310+3.373/5
15Mumbai
Maharashtra
5.86702+3.245/5
16Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
5.40816+3.583/5
17Indore
Madhya Pradesh
4.41517-3.453/5
18Chennai
Tamil Nadu
4.321212+6.663/5
19Agra
Uttar Pradesh
3.84419-6.392/5
20Bhopal
Madhya Pradesh
2.41420+3.932/5
21Bengaluru
Karnataka
2.061211+1.464/5
22Pune
Maharashtra
1.10421+1.463/5

A city qualifies with at least 3 exact-tag reports and 300 total civic reports across complete years 2021–2025.

City-by-city evidence
Normalized #1 · raw-volume #6 · established coverage base

Jodhpur: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

24 tagged reports appeared within 3,256 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 73.71 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 101.60 in 2021–2023 versus 25.23 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2021.

Normalized signal
73.71
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
24
4 active years
Recent change
-76.37
per-10K points
Action marker
8.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 160.14/10K (9 reports)2022 · 57.54/10K (5 reports)2023 · 110.06/10K (7 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 41.44/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 24

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (8.3%) and conclusion language in 2 (8.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jodhpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #2 · raw-volume #5 · established coverage base

Prayagraj: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

37 tagged reports appeared within 16,169 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 22.88 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 21.75 in 2021–2023 versus 24.07 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
22.88
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
37
5 active years
Recent change
+2.32
per-10K points
Action marker
27.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.41/10K (1 reports)2022 · 25.46/10K (6 reports)2023 · 25.24/10K (11 reports)2024 · 26.36/10K (11 reports)2025 · 21.50/10K (8 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 37

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 10 reports (27.0%) and conclusion language in 10 (27.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Prayagraj's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #3 · raw-volume #15 · qualified coverage base

Surat: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

8 tagged reports appeared within 4,191 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 19.09 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 28.46 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
19.09
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
8
1 active years
Recent change
-28.46
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 58.57/10K (8 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 8

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Surat's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #4 · raw-volume #3 · established coverage base

Lucknow: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

66 tagged reports appeared within 35,340 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 18.68 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 28.60 in 2021–2023 versus 3.57 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
18.68
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
66
4 active years
Recent change
-25.03
per-10K points
Action marker
18.2%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.50/10K (3 reports)2022 · 63.26/10K (51 reports)2023 · 10.61/10K (7 reports)2024 · 6.56/10K (5 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 66

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 12 reports (18.2%) and conclusion language in 12 (18.2%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Lucknow's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #5 · raw-volume #8 · qualified coverage base

Nagpur: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

18 tagged reports appeared within 10,447 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 17.23 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 20.61 in 2021–2023 versus 10.95 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
17.23
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
18
5 active years
Recent change
-9.66
per-10K points
Action marker
27.8%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.19/10K (1 reports)2022 · 15.53/10K (4 reports)2023 · 34.59/10K (9 reports)2024 · 12.85/10K (2 reports)2025 · 9.54/10K (2 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 18

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 5 reports (27.8%) and conclusion language in 5 (27.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nagpur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #6 · raw-volume #9 · qualified coverage base

Kochi: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

14 tagged reports appeared within 9,077 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 15.42 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 3.20 in 2021–2023 versus 42.51 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
15.42
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
14
3 active years
Recent change
+39.31
per-10K points
Action marker
21.4%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 7.26/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 49.96/10K (6 reports)2025 · 36.99/10K (6 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 14

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (21.4%) and conclusion language in 3 (21.4%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kochi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #7 · raw-volume #18 · qualified coverage base

Nashik: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 3,489 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 14.33 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.00 in 2021–2023 versus 54.95 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
14.33
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
1 active years
Recent change
+54.95
per-10K points
Action marker
20.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 91.91/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (20.0%) and conclusion language in 1 (20.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Nashik's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #8 · raw-volume #4 · established coverage base

Kolkata: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

39 tagged reports appeared within 31,282 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 12.47 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.06 in 2021–2023 versus 20.02 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
12.47
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
39
5 active years
Recent change
+14.96
per-10K points
Action marker
10.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 2.53/10K (1 reports)2022 · 4.66/10K (3 reports)2023 · 7.40/10K (4 reports)2024 · 1.94/10K (2 reports)2025 · 56.20/10K (29 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 39

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (10.3%) and conclusion language in 4 (10.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Kolkata's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #9 · raw-volume #1 · high coverage base

New Delhi: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

329 tagged reports appeared within 297,207 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 11.07 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 11.07 in 2021–2023 versus 11.08 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
11.07
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
329
5 active years
Recent change
+0.01
per-10K points
Action marker
15.5%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.85/10K (31 reports)2022 · 11.10/10K (72 reports)2023 · 13.74/10K (97 reports)2024 · 12.67/10K (78 reports)2025 · 9.28/10K (51 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 329

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 51 reports (15.5%) and conclusion language in 51 (15.5%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open New Delhi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #10 · raw-volume #22 · qualified coverage base

Moradabad: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

3 tagged reports appeared within 3,657 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 8.20 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.00 in 2021–2023 versus 14.60 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
8.20
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
3
1 active years
Recent change
+14.60
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 34.21/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 3

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 1 (33.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Moradabad's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #11 · raw-volume #13 · qualified coverage base

Jaipur: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

12 tagged reports appeared within 16,200 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.41 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 7.77 in 2021–2023 versus 6.77 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
7.41
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
12
3 active years
Recent change
-1.00
per-10K points
Action marker
33.3%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.68/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 17.25/10K (7 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 12.07/10K (4 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 12

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (33.3%) and conclusion language in 4 (33.3%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Jaipur's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #12 · raw-volume #7 · qualified coverage base

Patna: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

19 tagged reports appeared within 26,153 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.26 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.49 in 2021–2023 versus 9.49 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
7.26
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
19
5 active years
Recent change
+4.00
per-10K points
Action marker
31.6%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 6.85/10K (3 reports)2022 · 5.58/10K (3 reports)2023 · 4.16/10K (2 reports)2024 · 10.52/10K (6 reports)2025 · 8.49/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 19

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 6 reports (31.6%) and conclusion language in 6 (31.6%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Patna's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #13 · raw-volume #14 · qualified coverage base

Varanasi: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

10 tagged reports appeared within 13,958 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 7.16 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a broadly stable share of local civic coverage: 6.98 in 2021–2023 versus 7.45 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
7.16
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
10
3 active years
Recent change
+0.47
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 10.89/10K (4 reports)2023 · 7.70/10K (2 reports)2024 · 11.34/10K (4 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 10

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Varanasi's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #14 · raw-volume #10 · qualified coverage base

Noida: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

13 tagged reports appeared within 20,361 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 6.38 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 5.00 in 2021–2023 versus 8.37 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
6.38
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
13
3 active years
Recent change
+3.37
per-10K points
Action marker
53.8%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 6.47/10K (3 reports)2023 · 7.30/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 21.41/10K (7 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 13

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 7 reports (53.8%) and conclusion language in 7 (53.8%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Noida's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #15 · raw-volume #2 · established coverage base

Mumbai: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

70 tagged reports appeared within 119,517 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 5.86 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 4.66 in 2021–2023 versus 7.90 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
5.86
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
70
5 active years
Recent change
+3.24
per-10K points
Action marker
20.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.31/10K (10 reports)2022 · 1.75/10K (5 reports)2023 · 8.54/10K (20 reports)2024 · 4.29/10K (9 reports)2025 · 11.13/10K (26 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 70

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 14 reports (20.0%) and conclusion language in 14 (20.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Mumbai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #16 · raw-volume #16 · qualified coverage base

Thiruvananthapuram: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

8 tagged reports appeared within 14,806 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 5.40 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 4.15 in 2021–2023 versus 7.73 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
5.40
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
8
3 active years
Recent change
+3.58
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 9.87/10K (4 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 3.81/10K (1 reports)2025 · 11.75/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 8

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Thiruvananthapuram's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #17 · raw-volume #17 · qualified coverage base

Indore: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

5 tagged reports appeared within 11,332 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.41 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 5.74 in 2021–2023 versus 2.29 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2022.

Normalized signal
4.41
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
5
3 active years
Recent change
-3.45
per-10K points
Action marker
80.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 11.71/10K (3 reports)2023 · 3.54/10K (1 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 3.93/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 5

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 4 reports (80.0%) and conclusion language in 4 (80.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Indore's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #18 · raw-volume #12 · qualified coverage base

Chennai: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

12 tagged reports appeared within 27,784 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 4.32 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.31 in 2021–2023 versus 7.97 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
4.32
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
12
3 active years
Recent change
+6.66
per-10K points
Action marker
16.7%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2022 · 4.20/10K (2 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 8.33/10K (5 reports)2025 · 7.64/10K (5 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 12

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 2 reports (16.7%) and conclusion language in 2 (16.7%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Chennai's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #19 · raw-volume #19 · qualified coverage base

Agra: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 10,412 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 3.84 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a falling share of local civic coverage: 6.39 in 2021–2023 versus 0.00 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2023.

Normalized signal
3.84
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
-6.39
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 4.41/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 17.09/10K (3 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Agra's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #20 · raw-volume #20 · qualified coverage base

Bhopal: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 16,621 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.41 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.95 in 2021–2023 versus 4.88 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.41
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
2 active years
Recent change
+3.93
per-10K points
Action marker
0.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 3.60/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2025 · 8.43/10K (3 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 0 reports (0.0%) and conclusion language in 0 (0.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bhopal's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #21 · raw-volume #11 · qualified coverage base

Bengaluru: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

12 tagged reports appeared within 58,199 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 2.06 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 1.35 in 2021–2023 versus 2.81 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2025.

Normalized signal
2.06
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
12
4 active years
Recent change
+1.46
per-10K points
Action marker
25.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.59/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 2.38/10K (3 reports)2024 · 1.50/10K (2 reports)2025 · 3.96/10K (6 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 12

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 3 reports (25.0%) and conclusion language in 3 (25.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Bengaluru's broader civic problems analysis →
Normalized #22 · raw-volume #21 · qualified coverage base

Pune: Appeal Hearing reporting profile

4 tagged reports appeared within 36,239 civic reports in 2021–2025, equal to 1.10 per 10,000. The recent-period comparison shows a rising share of local civic coverage: 0.48 in 2021–2023 versus 1.94 in 2024–2025. The city's peak normalized year was 2024.

Normalized signal
1.10
per 10K civic reports
Tagged coverage
4
3 active years
Recent change
+1.46
per-10K points
Action marker
25.0%
classifier coverage
20212025
Annual evidence
2021 · 1.65/10K (1 reports)2022 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2023 · 0.00/10K (0 reports)2024 · 2.47/10K (2 reports)2025 · 1.36/10K (1 reports)
Classifier category mix
Legal Judicial · 4

The classifier marked authority or institutional action in 1 reports (25.0%) and conclusion language in 1 (25.0%). These are article-level signals: repeated coverage can refer to the same underlying event, and the markers do not prove official resolution.

Open Pune's broader civic problems analysis →
National trend and methodology
All 45 cities

Annual normalized signal

20212025
2021 · 4.17/10K (65)2022 · 7.76/10K (169)2023 · 8.64/10K (187)2024 · 6.64/10K (136)2025 · 8.89/10K (172)

Annual values use all covered cities, including cities that do not pass the page-level ranking gate.

Transparent limits

How Prism Geo built this ranking

  • Universe: 45 Indian cities with an existing Prism Geo city manifest; conservative legacy names such as Bangalore/Bengaluru are merged.
  • Window: complete calendar years 2021–2025. Partial 2026 data is excluded.
  • Signal: the exact source tag appeal_hearing; topic variants are not silently combined.
  • Score: tagged reports ÷ all civic reports × 10,000; raw volume is shown alongside it.
  • Coverage, action, and conclusion figures are classifier outputs. Multiple reports can concern one event, and absence of coverage is not absence of a problem.

Source: marketai.civic_geo_agg. This dataset supports comparison of reporting patterns only; it cannot establish actual case counts, risk, prevalence, or official performance.

Need to go deeper than a city?

Fliar Prism answers any market, company or research question with the same depth — real-time, across every industry.

Explore Fliar Prism →